rigel a écrit :
Salut +Jade+, c'est vraiment sympa de te lire à nouveau!!!
En fait je fais un tour de temps à autre sur le site, pour voir si quelque "vétéran" comme nous s'est manifesté. Je ne cours plus après le score : place aux jeunes! Me voici - enfin! - détrôné en beauté par un "maniaque" du démineur à l'ego démesuré (lol) : ça devait arriver!

"Les jeunes ne sont pas assez avisés pour être prudents, c'est pourquoi, génération après génération, ils continuent de tenter l'impossible... et de l'atteindre."
***** citation de Pearl Sydenstricker Buck *****

Congratulations, EWQMinesweeper, You are the King! ;)

+Jade+ a écrit :
Coucou à tous!!! Contente de te revoir Rigel! Et bienvenue à EWQMinesweeper! Félicitations pour ces nouveaux reccords! La course pour le haut du classement est relancée! Bravo ;)

EWQMinesweeper a écrit :
@rigel: 57s dans le tournoi des champios........

what do you say now? i guess now there is no doubt that i am the fastest and best SquarO player ever :P

EWQMinesweeper a écrit :
also got a 66s in the tournoi des champions

rigel, i think i mow have the best scores ever in both tournaments.....

EWQMinesweeper a écrit :
just set a new all time best score in the 5*5 tournament: 18s (5+6+7). i think i'll be able to get this score some more times, maybe i'll even get a 15s some time.

EWQMinesweeper a écrit :
20s barrier in the 5*5 tournament is broken!!!!

i set a new overall best time of 19s (6+6+7) today!


@rigel: now i can definetely cann myself the fastest squaro player ever (still working on best ever) ;)

EWQMinesweeper a écrit :
@rigel: merci beaucoup!

"and I'm still the Emperor... notwithstanding the fact that I retired : now I prefer sleeping at night!" - i got the 21 and 78 at around 15:00 - 16:00, but yes, there once was a time when i played squaro till 3:00 in the morning. now, since i retired from minesweeper i have much more time for squaro and don't need to play till the early morning.

"You got 21s, so you are at the top of all times best scores." - i still think that there is room for improvement (i want a sub20 game)

"Your 78s are very good, you have already the 3rd place. Luckydigit has made 70s and my best score is 68s " - considering that my best times in 7*7 practice on medium and hard are 16 and 18 the subminute should be possible, what do you think? i'll try to beat your 68 and then i think i can really call myself the fastest squaro player ever (not the best of course, only the fastest;)

ps: do you have facebook?/have you seen the squaro pages there?

rigel a écrit :
Great, EWQMinesweeper, you're a real warrior of the SquarO!
You got 21s, so you are at the top of all times best scores.
The champions' tournament has been set in august of 2007 for its last evolution. Your 78s are very good, you have already the 3rd place. Luckydigit has made 70s and my best score is 68s (and I'm still the Emperor... notwithstanding the fact that I retired : now I prefer sleeping at night!)
Just persevere, I know you can do it! ;)

rigel a écrit :
Great, EWQMinesweeper, you're a real warrior of the SquarO!
You got 21s, so you are at the top of all times best scores.
The champions' tournament has been set in august of 2007 for its last evolution. Your 78s are very good, you have already the 3rd place. Luckydigit has made 70s and my best score is 68s (and I'm still the Emperor... notwithstanding the fact that I retired : now I prefer sleeping at night!)
Just persevere, I know you can do it! ;)

EWQMinesweeper a écrit :
just set a new best in the 7*7 tournament of 78s!!!!!!!!!!!!!

since the best times in the results of the previous tournaments (both in the 5*5 and in the 7*7) go up and down i wonder if the tournaments always had the settings they now have (3 5*5 easy boards / 3 7*7 boards with different difficulties). can someone please explain? cuz i'd really like to know how good my records are and if they aybe are all-time bests....